The matter was simple. There had been a dispute over some land. One side said that he had bought it and paid for it and that from that moment it belonged to him. The other side agreed but, as seeds were planted in that land before the sale, argued that everything they harvested was not a part of the deal. And that this began to provide from the end of the harvest and that the harvest ended.
The person who was making a claim and who already had a court Judgment against him was the one who had bought the land. He wanted to keep what had been sown previously for, obviously, it carried value. He argued before the rural judge that, when he bought the land, no one had said to him that he could not keep what was already sown there. The way that he saw it was that it was in his interest that the
