CHARLES SCHWAB HAD a mill manager whose people weren’t producing
their quota of work.
‘How is it,’ Schwab asked him, ‘that a manager as capable as you can’t
make this mill turn out what it should?’
‘I don’t know,’ the manager replied. ‘I’ve coaxed the men, I’ve pushed
them, I’ve sworn and cussed, I’ve threatened them with damnation and
being fired. But nothing works. They just won’t produce.’
This conversation took place at the end of the day, just before the night
shift came on. Schwab asked the manager for a piece of chalk, then, turning
to the nearest man, asked:
‘How many heats did your shift make today?’
‘Six.’
Without another word, Schwab chalked a big figure ‘6’ on the floor,
and walked away.
When the night shift came in, they saw the ‘6’ and asked what it
meant.
‘The big boss was in here today,’ the day people said. ‘He asked us
how many heats we made, and we told him six. He chalked it on the floor.’
The next morning Schwab walked through the mill again. The night
shift had rubbed out ‘6’ and replaced it with a big ‘7.’
When the day shift reported for work the next morning, they saw a big
‘7’ chalked on the floor. So the night shift thought they were better than the
day shift, did they? Well, they would show the night shift a thing or two.
The crew pitched in with enthusiasm, and when they quit that night, they
left behind them an enormous, swaggering ‘10.’ Things were stepping up.
Shortly this mill, which had been lagging way behind in production,
was turning out more work than any other mill in the plant.
The principle?
Let Charles Schwab say it in his own words: ‘The way to get things
done,’ says Schwab, ‘is to stimulate competition. I do not mean in a sordid
money-getting way, but in the desire to excel.’
The desire to excel! The challenge! Throwing down the gauntlet! An
infallible way of appealing to people of spirit.
Without a challenge, Theodore Roosevelt would never have been
President of the United States. The Rough Rider, just back from Cuba, was
picked for governor of New York State. The opposition discovered he was
no longer a legal resident of the state, and Roosevelt, frightened, wished to
withdraw. Then Thomas Collier Platt, then U.S. Senator from New York,
threw down the challenge. Turning suddenly on Theodore Roosevelt, he
cried in a ringing voice: ‘Is the hero of San Juan Hill a coward?’
Roosevelt stayed in the fight – and the rest is history. A challenge not
only changed his life; it had a real effect upon the future of his nation.
‘All men have fears, but the brave put down their fears and go forward,
sometimes to death, but always to victory’ was the motto of the King’s
Guard in ancient Greece. What greater challenge can be offered than the
opportunity to overcome those fears?
When Al Smith was the governor of New York, he was up against it.
Sing Sing, at the time the most notorious penitentiary west of Devil’s
Island, was without a warden. Scandals had been sweeping through the
prison walls, scandals and ugly rumours. Smith needed a strong man to rule
Sing Sing – an iron man. But who? He sent for Lewis E. Lawes of New
Hampton.
‘How about going up to take charge of Sing Sing?’ he said jovially
when Lawes stood before him. ‘They need a man up there with experience.’
Lawes was flabbergasted. He knew the dangers of Sing Sing. It was a
political appointment, subject to the vagaries of political whims. Wardens
had come and gone – one lasted only three weeks. He had a career to
consider. Was it worth the risk?
Then Smith, who saw his hesitation, leaned back in his chair and
smiled. ‘Young fellow,’ he said, ‘I don’t blame you for being scared. It’s a
tough spot. It’ll take a big person to go up there and stay.’
So he went. And he stayed. He stayed, to become the most famous
warden of his time. His book 20,000 Years in Sing Sing sold into the
hundred of thousands of copies. His broadcasts on the air and his stories of
prison life have inspired dozens of movies. His ‘humanising’ of criminals
wrought miracles in the way of prison reform.
‘I have never found,’ said Harvey S. Firestone, founder of the great
Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company, ‘that pay and pay alone would either
bring together or hold good people. I think it was the game itself.’
Frederic Herzberg, one of the great behavioural scientists, concurred.
He studied in depth the work attitudes of thousands of people ranging from
factory workers to senior executives. What do you think he found to be the
most motivating factor – the one facet of the jobs that was most
stimulating? Money? Good working conditions? Fringe benefits? No – not
any of those. The one major factor that motivated people was the work
itself. If the work was exciting and interesting, the worker looked forward
to doing it and was motivated to do a good job.
That is what every successful person loves: the game. The chance for
self-expression. The chance to prove his or her worth, to excel, to win. That
is what makes foot-races, and hog-calling, and pie-eating contests. The
desire to excel. The desire for a feeling of importance.