He texts at nine the next morning.
Not a call. A text, which I appreciate more than I will ever tell him, because a call would have required my voice to be doing something functional and I am not confident it would have cooperated. The text says: Lunch today. I'll come to you. Twelve-thirty. Let me know if that doesn't work.
It is not a question. It is a statement with a courtesy clause attached, which is, I am learning, how Killian Black does most things.
I text back: Fine.
He texts: Good.
This is the entirety of our communication until he is standing at the green door at twelve twenty-eight, which is two minutes early, which tells me everything I need to know about how he operates. He is holding a paper bag from the Italian place on Vine Street that has a forty-minute wait and doesn't do takeaway.
"They don't do takeaway," I say.
"They do for me," he says.
I let him in.
We eat at my desk because it is the only flat surface in the apartment that isn't a stack of books. He doesn't comment on the furniture situation, or the lack thereof, which I appreciate. He unpacks the bag with the efficiency of someone who has thought through the logistics of eating in a chairless flat and adapted accordingly — containers, napkins, two bottles of water, and, at the bottom of the bag, a small container of something that turns out to be tiramisu.
I look at it.
"You don't have to eat it," he says.
"I'm absolutely going to eat it," I say. "I just wasn't expecting it."
"You said the coffee tastes like nothing. Tiramisu is different."
I stop. "I never said that to you."
A beat. Something crosses his expression — not quite caught, more like a man who has said a precise thing and is now accounting for the precision. "You mentioned it. In passing."
"I mentioned it once. In a professional context. Three weeks ago."
"I have a good memory," he says, and opens his own container, and that is apparently the end of that conversation.
I eat my lunch and I think about what it means that Killian Black has a good memory for small things I said in passing, and then I stop thinking about it because I have a list and we are here to work through the list and I am not adding items.
The list, as I have written it in my notebook — actual notebook, pen, physical record, because some things are too important for the notes app — has seven items.
I put it on the desk between us.
He reads it without touching it. Then he looks up.
"You made a project brief," he says.
"I made a list."
"It has headers."
"I like headers."
"There's a column for estimated timelines."
"That column is aspirational," I say. "Focus on the content."
He looks back at the list. I watch him read it — properly read it, in the way he does everything, with the complete attention of someone for whom partial engagement is not a setting. His expression doesn't change but his eyes move with the particular quality of someone filing things.
The list covers: medical, financial, living arrangements (provisional), work considerations, legal, the question of what we tell people and when, and, at the bottom, one item I almost removed three times before leaving it in: what this is.
He gets to that one. He reads it. He looks up.
"What this is," he says.
"I need a definition," I say. "I don't function well without definitions. I'm not asking for something complicated. I'm asking for a working arrangement I can operate within so I stop —" I pause. "So I can stop spending cognitive energy on the question."
He considers this for a moment in the way he considers everything, which is thoroughly and without the kind of performed thoughtfulness that people do when they want you to know they're thinking. He is actually thinking. The difference is legible.
"Co-parents," he says. "For now. With the understanding that now is not necessarily permanent."
"That's not a definition. That's a holding position."
"Yes," he says simply. "It is."
I look at him. He looks back. He is, I note, completely unintimidated by the list, the headers, the timeline column, or me. Most people find the list a little much. He looks at it the way he looked at the gothic argument — like something that has given him useful information about the person who made it.
I find this, against my will, deeply inconvenient.
"Okay," I say. "Co-parents for now." I pick up my pen. I write it at the top of the list. "Next item."
We work through the list in order, which is the only way I know how to work through things.
Medical: he has a doctor. Not a pack doctor, a private physician who handles Black family health matters with the specific discretion of someone paid significantly for exactly that. He offers to make an introduction. I say I'll make my own appointments and share relevant information as appropriate. He nods and doesn't push, which is the correct response and I note it.
Financial: he raises it before I do, which I had been prepared to find offensive and instead find efficient. He is not offering maintenance or a settlement or anything with that flavour. He is offering a shared account, specifically for the baby, into which he will deposit a monthly amount we agree on, and over which I have equal control. "I don't want you making decisions based on resource constraints," he says. "That's all this is."
It is not all this is. It is also him making sure I cannot be in a position where I need something from him urgently and have to ask for it, which would give the situation a power dynamic he appears to have thought about and decided against. I know this because I have thought about it too, and the fact that he has arrived at the same conclusion without discussion is something I put in the back of my mind and leave there.
Living arrangements: he raises the estate. I say no. He does not argue. He says: "The bookshop flat is a one-bedroom." I say: "I'm aware." He says: "I'll send you some options. You choose, I'll cover the difference in rent if there is one." I say that's not necessary. He says: "It's practical." I say: "Most things with you are." He says: "Yes," and something about the lack of apology in it makes me look at him properly for a second.
He is watching me with the expression I first saw in the hotel bar — the one that isn't finished thinking. It is, I note, his most frequent expression where I am concerned.
I look back at the list.
Work, we agree, stays exactly as it is. Third floor. Professional distance. The hotel still doesn't exist and neither does this conversation, within the building's walls. He will ensure there is no structural awkwardness with HR. I will continue to do my job at the level I have been doing it, which has, he tells me without apparent effort, been noticed by Marcus and by the creative director two floors above.
I had not known that.
I write it down.
Not on the list. In the margin. Small.
We get to the last item.
What we tell people and when.
He reads it. "Your call," he says. "All of it. You decide what, who, and when. I'll follow your lead."
"Your family will need to know eventually."
"Yes."
"That's going to be a conversation."
"Several," he says, "none of which are your problem to manage."
I look at him. "You have a pack. A dynasty. A family that has generational opinions about bloodlines and bonds and succession. I am a packless graphic designer from the territory they probably have three-generation feuds with. The idea that this isn't my problem to manage is —"
"Not your problem," he says again, quietly, like someone placing a fact down carefully. "I'll handle my family. My territory. You don't need to be the thing that gets managed by anyone on my side. That's a line I'm drawing."
The room is quiet.
Outside, the Cascade Falls afternoon has settled into the specific grey-green that makes everything look slightly mythological. The mountains somewhere behind the clouds. The old-growth pressing against the edges of the city the way it always has, patient and enormous and completely indifferent.
I have been alone in this city for six weeks. I have been performing fine for longer than that. I have a list with headers and timeline columns and a working definition at the top that says co-parents for now and somewhere underneath all of it I am a woman who has not had a single person take something off her plate in longer than she can accurately remember.
He has just taken several things off the plate.
I am not going to make a thing of it. I am not going to let my face do the thing it wants to do. I am going to finish the list and see him out and then I am going to sit very quietly by myself and feel whatever this is in private, the way I feel everything.
"Thank you," I say. Precise. Professional.
He nods. He packs up the containers. He gets to the tiramisu, which is empty because I ate the entire thing approximately twenty minutes ago without noticing.
He looks at the empty container. He doesn't say anything.
But the corner of his mouth does something.
It is an extremely small something. It is barely a something at all. It is the ghost of amusement on a face that doesn't do amusement easily, there and gone in under a second, and I see it because I was looking, and I was looking because I have been trying to read him since the hotel bar and I have not stopped.
He picks up the bag.
"I'll send the rental options this week," he says.
"I'll look at them," I say. Which is not yes and is not no and we both understand exactly what it means.
He leaves. I hear his footsteps on the side stairs, unhurried, and then the sound of the green door closing at the bottom with its familiar resistance, the wood swollen from the rain.
I sit at the desk.
I look at the list.
Co-parents for now. With the understanding that now is not necessarily permanent.
I draw a small, careful box around the last four words.
Then I close the notebook.
I don't open it again that evening.
But I think about those four words for the rest of the night.