No easy path lay ahead for the divorce lawsuit.
Refusing to agree to an amicable split, Samuel either could not admit his own faults or still clung to the foolish hope that I would change my mind.
I had no choice but to proceed with formal litigation.
Inside the courtroom, he insisted firmly that his relationship with Sally was purely platonic, nothing more than ordinary friendship.
My lawyer presented all the surveillance footage as key evidence.
Arguing against the footage, Samuel claimed distorted camera angles created false impressions, branding their intimate moments as drunken accidents.
He even accused me of violating his privacy by installing home cameras.
Fully prepared for this defense, my lawyer submitted supplementary proof: the cameras had been installed in the jointly
