Allure makes a decision about Lord Justice Kennedy, Mr. Justice Simon and Mr. Justice Bean required only one day to hear and gauge the contentions, and conveyed their decision on the morning of Friday 21 January:
In our judgment, there is no substance at all in the principal ground of allure [concerning the juror] …
In [the second ground of appeal] our judgment is the appointed authority was on the whole correct to run as he did. The proof which the litigant tried to avoid was applicable to build up a rationale in the offenses charged in the prosecution, and proof of intention is consistently acceptable to show that it is more likely than not that the blamed submitted the offense charged (see R v Ball [1911] AC 47) …
Along these lines, neither of the grounds of allure having been set up
