Pathe Prabasa : Annadashankar Roy:Studycarepublication:-In the world of literature, there are some important, promising new writers they can identify at a glance. I remember reading a story by an anonymous writer published in the Desh newspaper in the sixties, Abu Syed Ayub wrote a letter to Desh . The story was titled 'White Stone Table', authored by Sanjeev Chattopadhyay. Many years ago, another Jahuri made a similar comment in the introduction to Pata Prabase : "When I first read Pata Prabase in Bichitra magazine , I was truly shocked. Not a thousand people can write such mature writings with a pen." This is Jahuri Pramath Chowdhury. In the preface, he says: " I spontaneously wrote the introduction to Pathe Pravase for two reasons. I am naturally happy when I meet a new writer in Bengali. It goes without saying that the one who starts writing is not the new writer. He who can write firstly, and secondly whose There is novelty in writing, that is, a special expression of one's own mind, he is the true new writer."Pathe Pravase was first published in book form in 1931. It has since had many editions, which are a sign of readership. In fact Annadashankar's once popular novels Play with Dolls , Ratna and Srimati or the contemplative essays are almost forgotten now. But the appeal of his rhymes to the modern reader is irresistible, and the journey continues on this literary path .Pathe Pravase was written in 1927-1929. After succeeding in the Indian Civil Service Examination, he spent two years in exile for his apprenticeship. He was twenty-three-twenty-four. Visited England and some European countries outside London during holidays; In his words, 'My eyes have gone out into the orbit like a horse on a horse's back.' Annadashankar saw, felt, analyzed and recorded the experience. Pramath Chowdhury writes: 'His travelogue has become true literature. ... And there can be no doubt that there is a clear identity of a lively mind behind the opinion of this writer.'The vast majority of expat experiences naturally revolve around London and England. And there is the experience of short-term travel to some cities in Switzerland, Paris, Vienna, Germany and Italy. As the picture of the characteristic differences of these places is clear in his lively description, the analysis of the characteristic features of the people of those countries is also thorough. The city of London, in his eyes, is a bigger version of South Calcutta, but the difference is in its cleanliness, orderliness even in the crowd, the unhurried activity of the common people. He has analyzed the English character in various ways. English nineteen, inept in conversation, but keen sense of decency. As his reason, he said: 'The reason for the wonderful unity of England is that the country of England is very narrow and small in length, breadth and height. .... What is called pure provincialism is only possible in islanders and landless islanders. No international movement will survive in England, Christianity will not survive, Socialism will not survive. As the Church of England created its own Christianity, so the Labor Party is creating its own Socialism. Pure nationalism was first possible in England, and in England it will last. The reason for this is natural.'Socialism promises equal opportunities for people. By whatever name it is called, socialism in England is marked by its biased supervision of boarding schools, nursing homes, hospitals, public libraries, etc. The aristocracy is about to disappear, but the influence of the aristocracy permeates society. His observation is: "Itrejna has a penchant for being considered 'respectable', even girls of Jhi-Thakrun's class are ladies at heart." He thinks: 'The public in a democratic country does not allow anyone to be extraordinary. England's democracy is purer than America, France and Russia. That is why a Ford or Anatole France or Lenin is not possible in England.' According to him: 'England prevents revolution by letting it happen little by little every day.' This social revolution was made possible as a result of the spare time enthusiasm of very ordinary people, 'not the full-time work of extraordinary men like Mahatma Gandhi.' He lamented: 'If everyone in our country did a little something - did it every day, then our extraordinary people would not have to spin like a spinning wheel.England colonized India. Annadashankar thinks this is no accident. India and England are antipodes in the world of characters. ... England has rushed to perfect India as the lack of air in one corner of the sky rushes in from another. ... If France had held the hand of India, she would not have been at odds with India, as happened with England. But then India's character would never have got a chance to be fulfilled.'Not only India, England's imperialism took place in many other countries. According to Annadashankar: 'The British have exploited and ruled as many countries as they have..
Dreame-Editor's pick
Her Regret: Alpha, Take Me Home
The Forgotten Princess & Her Beta Mates
Part of your World
Seriously, There Are Werewolves?
The Luna Who Does Not Kneel
The Betrayed Luna's Shadow
